Skip to main content

Java: Generics dont keep it simple stupid

So I was playing around with generics (dont love them because of type erasure - class level is ok method level gets scary) the other day and here are some examples and lessons learned:

1) Method level generics with return types are harder than they look.
2) Wildcards and when to use them confuse me.
3) My code is ugly and I must be missing something but what - who knows.


What I wanted was a Singleton class with generic get and put methods (what you put in is what you get out) without the cast. Something that works a little like Collections.emptyList();


The map I was storing my generic stuff in  ignore the naming for now:

What I wanted to do is something like this:

CacheItem<AnItem>  someCacheItem  = new DateCacheItemImpl<AnItem>();

Cache.getInstance().register(NameCacheItem.class);
Cache.getInstance().put(someCacheItem);

CacheItem<AnotherItem>  anotherCacheItem  = Cache.getInstance().get();



private ConcurrentHashMap<String, CacheItem<? extends ParentItem>> cacheMap =
  new ConcurrentHashMap<String, CacheItem<? extends  Parent Item>>();

public <T extends CacheItem<? extends  ParentItem >> void put(T cacheInstance) {

    cacheMap.put(cacheInstance.getCacheKey(), cacheInstance);
}

public <T extends CacheItem<? extends  ParentItem>> T get(String cacheKey) {
    return (T)cacheMap.get(cacheKey);
}

    public <T extends CacheItem<? extends  ParentItem >> void registerCache(Class<T> clazz) {

        try {
            CacheItem<? extends  ParentItem  > cacheInstance = clazz.newInstance();
            put(cacheInstance);
        } catch (InstantiationException e) {
            LOGGER.warning("Unable to create cache " + clazz.getName());
        } catch (IllegalAccessException e) {
            LOGGER.warning("Unable to create cache " + clazz.getName());
        }
    }


Not exactly what I wanted, will update this post once I have a epiphany.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

MANIFEST.MF merge JDeveloper for an executable jar

Goto your project > properties. Then click on deployment in the menu. Edit or add a jar deployment profile. Fill in the details under jar options (select Include manifest and give it a main class name) Also remember that the merge functionality only works with a BLANK line at the end of the merge file. REALLY this caught me. My merge file contents: Class-Path: commons-codec-1.3.jar [...empty line here CRLF...]

JBO-25013: TooManyObjectsException

oracle.jbo.TooManyObjectsException: JBO-25013: Too many objects match the primary key oracle.jbo.Key[Key null ]. Ok so for you it may be trying to insert a duplicate record this should explain your problem (also check trigger they could be the cause.) NOTE: You can also try to create a new duplicate EO if you have a page with two VO's using the same EO. This could sort your problems. For me I needed to add a launch listener on my LOV and clear the cache of my vo. LOV <af:inputListOfValues id="NameId" popupTitle="#{bindings.Name.hints.label}" value="#{bindings.RolName1.inputValue}" label="#{bindings.RolName1.hints.label}" model="#{bindings.RolName1.listOfValuesModel}" required="#{bindings.RolName1.hints.mandatory}" columns="#{bindings.RolName1.hints.displayWidth}" shortDesc="#{bindings.RolName1.hints.tooltip}" launchPopupListener="#{backingBeanScope.backingBean.launchPop...

ADF Encountered deferred syntax #{ in template text.

OracleJSP error: oracle.jsp.parse.JspParseException:  Error: Encountered deferred syntax #{ in template text.  If intended as a literal, escape it or set directive  deferredSyntaxAllowedAsLiteral This normally happens when you have some tag lib dependancy problems but this was  not the case for me... My problem: For some reason my model project had web stuff in it(public html etc)  so I had to remove the public html stuff from my project and manually edit the Model.jpr project file and remove the tag lib entries at the bottom o the file. Go figure.